Posts Tagged ‘FAST search’

SharePoint FIS and SharePoint FIS Licensing: Usage Scenarios (Part 2 of 2)

February 19th, 2012
Posted by: admin

By Bill Peters
AIS Network Director of Sales

In my January 24 blog, I provided some responses to frequently asked questions about Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 for Internet Sites and licensing SharePoint FIS.

In this second part, we’ll look at SharePoint FIS licensing in a little more depth and also look at some various usage scenarios.*  For the purposes of this blog, “internal users” refers to employees, affiliates’ employees, on-site contractors and/or agents.  “External users” refers to all others.

What do I need for intranet and extranet sites?

For intranet and extranet networks used to support internal content, SharePoint Server 2010 is required.  If only internal users can access the content being stored, it must be hosted on a server licensed with SharePoint Server 2010.  It’s important to remember that content is only accessible by users or devices with a Client Access License (CAL) for SharePoint Server 2010.  SharePoint Server can still be used to support external content, although each user or device requires a CAL, whether they are internal or external.

What do I need for Internet sites?

For servers used to provide external content (typically) over the Internet, SharePoint FIS is required.  If the content being stored and accessed is available to external users, it can be hosted on a server licensed with SharePoint FIS, and users accessing that content will not require a CAL.  It’s important to remember that while SharePoint FIS is restricted to external content, it is not restricted to external users.  For example, an internal user (e.g., employee) would not require a CAL to access external content on an instance of SharePoint FIS.  As you can see, the choice between SharePoint Server and SharePoint FIS for external content is a financial one, unless the external users have anonymous access—in which case, SharePoint FIS is the only feasible option.

Can you show me some usage scenarios?

The following common deployment scenarios are excerpted from a very useful and detailed document entitled, “Microsoft Volume Licensing Brief:  Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 for Internet Sites” (October 2010), which helps in explaining the licensing requirements of SharePoint FIS.  Although covered for user-based CALs, these scenarios can also be used for device-based CALs.  For a copy of the full document, just email me at the address below.

First, have a look at the color code for the diagrams:

SharePoint 2010

Color code for diagrams. Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

SCENARIO A:  Intranet

Description: Internal users access information through LAN or the Internet. No other users (internal or external) have access to information or applications.

Example: A professional sports team sets up an intranet site accessed by managers, the coach, and players.  It is also used for support staff such as the physiotherapist who is an on-site contractor rather than an employee.  But the therapist still qualifies as an internal user.  A news reporter trying to access the SharePoint site is denied access.

Licensing:

  • Server — 1 SPS/Running Instance (RI)
  • Internal User — 1 CAL/User

Figure 1 – Scenario:  Intranet

SharePoint 2010 Sports Team Scenario

Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

Key Takeaway:

  • Licensing requirements for server and CAL remain the same for internal users based on the location of access (through LAN or the Internet).

 

SCENARIO B:  Intranet Plus Extranet

Description: An organization with information accessible only by internal users (i.e., internal content) chooses to extend access to a limited number of identifiable external users.  In this case, the identifiable external users have access to all information, previously accessible by internal users only.   The organization may choose to license those external users either via SPS/CAL or SPSFIS for authenticated external users.  This decision is typically made based on cost.

Example:  The Elm University publishes research papers, which are made available to specific educators from other universities (external users).  This situation is assumed to be an intranet plus extranet scenario, even though the Elm University does not have a public-facing Web site.

Licensing:

  • Server — 1 SPS/RI
  • Internal User — 1 CAL/User
  • External User — 1 CAL/User

-or-

  • Server — 1 SPS/RI (for internal use), 1 SPSFIS/RI* (for external use)
  • Internal User — 1 CAL/User
  • External User:  No additional licenses required.

SPS/CAL Only

Figure 2A – Scenario:  Intranet Plus Extranet Without SPSFIS

SharePoint 2010 Elm University Scenario A

Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

SPS/CAL Plus SPSFIS

Figure 2B – Scenario:  Intranet Plus Extranet with FIS

SharePoint 2010 Elm University Scenario B

Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

Key Takeaways:

  • You can choose between SPS/CAL or SPSFIS based on what is more economical to them given the number of external users.
  • The licensing requirement for internal user varies depending on the server license chosen and use (publishing or internal use of information/applications).
  • The university chooses to make external content available to selective external users.  With SPSFIS licensing, no restriction is made on how many external users access that information.

SCENARIO C:   Internet

Description: Internal users are publishing information for external users.  It is not possible to identify some or all of external users, so you must license external users via SPSFIS.  Because internal users access the same information as external users, all users can be licensed via SPSFIS, and no additional CALs are required.

In another example, a team of internal users is customizing the look and feel of the Web site and testing it before the changes go live in production; CALs are not required if the internal users have MSDN licenses.

Example: News Web site, knowledge forums, and social networking sites

Licensing:

  • Server — 1 SPSFIS/RI
  • Internal User — Need no CAL
  • External User — Need No CAL
  • Test/Dev: If users are covered via MSDN, no additional server licenses/CALs are required.

Figure 3 – Scenario:  Internet

SharePoint 2010 Newspaper Publishing Scenario

Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

Key Takeaways:

  • SPSFIS/RI is the only license required if internal users are accessing the same sites as external users.
  • Each staging server that is posting content requires its own SPSFIS/RI (same licensing requirement as production server).  This requirement excludes test staging servers because testing technical changes are covered under MSDN.

SCENARIO D:  Intranet Plus Internet

Description: You make some content available only to internal users, while other content is made available to anonymous external users.

You need one SPS/RI for the internal content, one CAL/user for all internal users accessing that internal content, and one SPSFIS/RI for the external content accessed by anonymous external users.  SPSFIS negates the need for CALs for internal users only publishing information and all external users.

Example: Woodgrove Bank offers loan information and the option to submit a loan application on its public-facing site, on which only internal users are allowed to view/work.

Licensing

  • Server — 1 SPS/RI for servers for internal information, 1 SPSFIS/RI* for servers for external information
  • Internal User (if only publishing) — needs no CAL
  • Internal User (otherwise) — 1 CAL/User
  • External User — needs no CAL

Figure 4 – Scenario:  Intranet Plus Internet

SharePoint 2010 Bank Scenario

Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

Key Takeaways:

  • If internal users are only publishing information and SPSFIS/RI is being used for the servers, CALs are not required for them.
  • If the contents/information/applications accessed by internal users are different from those accessed by external users, SPS/CAL licenses are required for internal users.

SCENARIO E:   Intranet Plus Internet Plus Extranet

Description: In this scenario, one subset of information is available only to internal users, another subset of information is available to both internal users and authenticated external users, and a third subset of  information is available to anonymous external users.

Example: Contoso Pharmaceutials maintains a public Web site accessible by all, offers collaboration with authenticated external users on specific research and development  projects, and hosts company’s internal intranet for its internal users.

Licensing:

  • Server — 1 SPS/RI for servers for internal information, 1 SPSFIS/RI for servers for external information*
  • Internal User (publishing) — needs no CAL
  • Internal User (otherwise) — 1 CAL/User, External User à needs no CAL
  • External User —  needs no CAL

*In the case of dedicated server for extranet, users would have a choice of SPSFIS to cover all authenticated external users or extending CALs to them, as discussed in Scenario 2.

Figure 5 – Scenario:  Intranet Plus Internet Plus Extranet

SharePoint 2010 Pharmaceutical Company Scenario

Source: Microsoft Volume Licensing

Key Takeaways:

  • This scenario shows that the Internet plus intranet plus extranet scenario is no different than the sum of the individual scenarios.
  • An organization can choose to make external information available to selective external users. However, with SPSFIS licensing, no licensing restriction is made on how many external users can access external information.

This is so confusing.  Isn’t there someone who can help me figure this out?

Yes, as I mentioned in January, if you think SharePoint FIS licensing is confusing, you are not alone.  I’m happy to walk you through it and help you assess your organization’s needs.

Call me at 1-888-401-AISN, or email me at:  bill.peters@aisn.net.  Or, simply leave a comment below.  Best of luck!

 

 

TAGS:

CATEGORIES:

SharePoint FIS and SharePoint FIS Licensing: FAQs (Part 1 of 2)

January 24th, 2012
Posted by: admin

SharePoint for Internet Sites

Ferrari's Web site is designed using SharePoint for Internet Sites. For more examples, go to our SharePoint FIS hosting page.

By Bill Peters
AIS Network Director of Sales

Offering cloud hosting for Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010 for Internet Sites (SharePoint FIS) was a no-brainer for us.  After all, digital content creators’ interest in the cloud, and the mobile access it affords, is surging.

Including SharePoint FIS hosting among our product offerings represents the first of several steps that AIS Network will take to expand its cloud hosting services for professionals working in digital content creation fields such as Web development, design, publishing, film, architecture, advertising, marketing and public relations.

Here are some “Frequently Asked Questions” focused on what SharePoint FIS is and how to make some sense of SharePoint FIS licensing.  My next entry, Part 2 of this two-part blog, will include specific usage scenarios and how to handle licensing in those cases.

What is SharePoint FIS?

SharePoint FIS empowers creative teams to publish beautiful, interactive external Internet and extranet sites, while dramatically simplifying Web content management and administration.

Who uses SharePoint FIS?

Hosted SharePoint for Internet Sites (SharePoint FIS) is ideal for compliance-focused corporate enterprises, associations and institutions that need to interact with a large number of users via a public-facing Web site.  Digital marketers and design agencies, who need to launch multiple Internet/extranet sites quickly and easily, are also making great use of SharePoint FIS.   You’ll find some examples on our SharePoint FIS hosting page.

What are my SharePoint FIS licensing options?

SharePoint FIS comes in two flavors, Standard and Enterprise.  SharePoint FIS Standard is scoped for a single domain only and has standard SharePoint features for unlimited users (anonymous or authenticated).  SharePoint FIS Enterprise, on the other hand, is scoped for multiple domains and has enterprise SharePoint features for unlimited users (anonymous or authenticated).  According to Microsoft…

SharePoint Server FIS Standard:

  • Helps small and mid-size organizations create public-facing Internet sites or basic extranets.
  • Provides licensing for the same features as the Standard CAL for SharePoint Server.
  • Designed only to be used for creating and hosting a single site resolved from a single domain name (such as aisn.com) and its subdomains (such as support.aisn.com).
  • When combined with active Microsoft Software Assurance, it’s eligible to be stepped up to SharePoint Server for Internet Sites Enterprise for an additional fee.

SharePoint Server FIS Enterprise:

  • Designed for enterprises to create externally-facing public Internet sites and secure private extranets using the full capabilities of SharePoint Server.
  • Provides licensing for all SharePoint Server features (the same as SharePoint Server Enterprise CAL).
  • Offers the rights to host an unlimited number of sites and/or domains.

So, SharePoint FIS Standard is for just one domain?

Yes, SharePoint FIS Standard can only be used to support a single site and its related subdomains on a single domain.  Because the licensing of SharePoint FIS is per running instance, you can run more than one site/domain using the Standard edition only if separate running instances are used for each site/domain and a unique license of SharePoint Server 2010 for Internet Sites Standard is allocated for each running instance.

Does SharePoint FIS Enterprise have FAST Search?

Yes.  For use in Internet/extranet scenarios, the on-premise server license also includes the rights to FAST Search. You can deploy a single server license of SharePoint FIS Enterprise as a SharePoint server OR a FAST Search server—but not both concurrently.  Keep in mind that FAST Search server licensing does not apply to SPLA licensing.

How is SharePoint FIS licensed?

SharePoint Server for Internet Sites is licensed per running instance.  No Client Access Licenses (CALs) are required, even for authors creating content.  When using SharePoint FIS for licensing external-facing scenarios, you must have a server license for all servers that are used to deliver content to external users – regardless of the farm configuration or whether or not users are directly accessing that server (staging, application, front-end, or index).

Servers in a development/test environment are exempt from this rule assuming they are covered by MSDN® developer program licensing. According to Microsoft, the underlying logic in this is that all servers supporting a specific solution (internal vs. external and production vs. development test) must be licensed similarly (i.e., in the CAL/Server model, the per-server “For Internet Sites” model, or the MSDN developer program). This is independent of the order in which information moves through servers.

What if I only need an intranet built on SharePoint?

Intranet sites are licensed using a Server/CAL (Client Access License) model.  SharePoint Server 2010 is required for each running instance of the software, and CALs are required for each person or device accessing a SharePoint Server.

This is so confusing.  Isn’t there someone who can help me figure this out?

Yes, you’re not alone in thinking that SharePoint FIS licensing is confusing.  I am happy to walk you through it and help you assess your organization’s needs.

Call me at 1-888-401-AISN, or email me at:  bill.peters@aisn.net.  Or, simply leave a comment below.  Good luck!

TAGS:

CATEGORIES:

Law Firms Like Hosted SharePoint 2010

October 26th, 2011
Posted by: admin

By Laurie Head
AIS Network Vice President

Wondering whether your law firm’s new hosted SharePoint 2010 deployment will be disruptive to the office culture?  Significant key benefits for IT staff as well as legal staff and their clients may very well justify the trouble and cost of deploying SharePoint 2010 in a legal environment.

What’s new in SharePoint 2010?  First and foremost, SharePoint 2010 has strong document management and powerful search capabilities.  That, combined with its ease of use, has made SharePoint a popular platform among law firms.

What’s compelling legal industry clients to consider seriously a hosted SharePoint 2010 deployment (or a migration to SharePoint 2010 from a previous version)?  Among many features, here are a handful of new SharePoint features that law firms like because they save time and money:

SharePoint for law firms

SharePoint helps lawyers manage their documents.

Expanded library support for large docs. SharePoint 2010 now supports millions of documents, which is a critical need for most law firms.  Enhanced reporting and tagging capabilities make finding key files and documents so much easier.

More powerful search capabilities. Purchase an additional license and SharePoint administrators can beef up their searches with FAST, a powerful search technology.  FAST enables staff to index billions of documents; search by industry, legal field or client name; and preview relevance via a thumbnail image.

Better records management. SharePoint 2010 allows records to be listed in multiple repositories, which is incredibly useful in enhancing staff productivity.  Designated users on the network can access records for reference, and editing privileges can be restricted.

Improved, automated workflows. SharePoint 2010 employs a new, user-friendly interface to allow non-technical staff to create smooth workflows (automated processes for approvals, adding a new employee, opening a new client case, etc.).

Convenient offline work capabilities. Those staff who travel and/or work remotely on a regular basis will appreciate that SharePoint 2010 documents can be taken offline, edited and synchronized later.

Enhanced document editing. SharePoint 2010 users don’t have to call the IT department for help every time they edit documents.

If you are working for a law firm and are using hosted SharePoint 2010, what features do you particularly like?

TAGS:

CATEGORIES: